Connect with us

Crime & Safety

NYPD officers acted within bounds of New York law when responding to armed attack by Courtney Gordon during early morning domestic violence call in Queens

Published

on

NYPD officers acted within bounds of New York law when responding to armed attack by Courtney Gordon during early morning domestic violence call in Queens

New York City, New York – In a significant announcement from New York Attorney General Letitia James’ Office of Special Investigation (OSI), the detailed report regarding the tragic incident leading to the death of Courtney Gordon was released. The event, which unfolded on December 3, 2023, involved a confrontation between Gordon and officers from the New York City Police Department (NYPD) in Queens, New York.

The investigation began after Gordon died following an early morning interaction with two NYPD officers who were responding to reports of an assault at a residence in Far Rockaway. According to the OSI report, the officers arrived at the location at approximately 5:08 a.m. following a distress call about an assault involving a knife.

Upon their arrival, the officers encountered Gordon descending the driveway carrying several pieces of luggage. The situation escalated rapidly when Gordon unexpectedly pulled out a knife and attacked the officers. He stabbed one officer in the neck and slashed another across the forehead. In response, one of the wounded officers fired his service weapon, striking Gordon, who was later pronounced dead at a local hospital.

The OSI’s investigation included a meticulous review of the body-worn camera footage, multiple interviews with witnesses and first responders, including FDNY paramedics, and a thorough legal analysis. The report highlighted that the officers were responding to a verified emergency involving a potentially armed individual. Gordon’s sudden violent actions posed an immediate threat to the officers’ safety, prompting the use of deadly force.

Under New York law, law enforcement officers are permitted to use deadly physical force if they reasonably believe it necessary to defend themselves or others from imminent harm. The OSI report concluded that, based on the evidence and the circumstances of the encounter, a prosecutor would face insurmountable challenges in proving that the officer’s use of force was not justified. Consequently, OSI determined that no criminal charges would be brought against the officers involved in the incident.

This decision underscores the complexity of such cases and the stringent standards set by the law when it comes to justifying the use of deadly force by police officers. The OSI’s thorough investigation aimed to ensure transparency and uphold justice, taking into account all available evidence and the legal framework governing police conduct. This incident continues to contribute to the ongoing dialogue around police interactions and the legal standards governing the use of force in complex, rapidly unfolding situations.

Advertisement

Trending